Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

Citations to this article as recorded by

Autologous Cranioplasty with Bone Flap Preserved in Conventional Freezers: An Adequate Option in Low Resource Settings

World Neurosurgery.2024; 182: 116. CrossRef

Risk Factor Analysis of Cryopreserved Autologous Bone Flap Resorption in Adult Patients Undergoing Cranioplasty with Volumetry Measurement Using Conventional Statistics and Machine-Learning Technique

Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2024; 67(1): 103. CrossRef

Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.2024; 67(1): 1. CrossRef

The Use of Histoacryl Injections to Treat Subgaleal Cerebrospinal Fluid Collection After Cranioplasty

Min Chan Kim, Jung Jae Lee, Eunhye Lee, Min Ho Lee

Operative Neurosurgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef

Cost differences between autologous and nonautologous cranioplasty implants: A propensity score–matched value driven outcomes analysis

Matthew Findlay, Sawyer Z. Bauer, Diwas Gautam, Matthew Holdaway, Robert B. Kim, Walid K. Salah, Spencer Twitchell, Sarah T. Menacho, Gurpreet S. Gandhoke, Ramesh Grandhi

World Neurosurgery: X.2024; 22: 100358. CrossRef

Bone Graft Substitutes and Enhancement in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery

Facial Plastic Surgery.2023; 39(05): 556. CrossRef

Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy—a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis

Jakob V. E. Gerstl, Luis F. Rendon, Shane M. Burke, Joanne Doucette, Rania A. Mekary, Timothy R. Smith

Acta Neurochirurgica.2022; 164(12): 3075. CrossRef

Materials Used in Cranial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Syed I. Khalid, Kyle B. Thomson, Samantha Maasarani, Aaron L. Wiegmann, Jenny Smith, Owoicho Adogwa, Ankit I. Mehta, Amir H. Dorafshar

World Neurosurgery.2022; 164: e945. CrossRef

Next-generation personalized cranioplasty treatment

Jeyapriya Thimukonda Jegadeesan, Manish Baldia, Bikramjit Basu

Acta Biomaterialia.2022; 154: 63. CrossRef

Long-term complications and implant survival rates after cranioplastic surgery: a single-center study of 392 patients

Henrik Giese, Jennifer Meyer, Andreas Unterberg, Christopher Beynon

Neurosurgical Review.2021; 44(3): 1755. CrossRef

Letter to the Editor: Complications following titanium cranioplasty compared with nontitanium implants cranioplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2021; 87: 32. CrossRef

Complications of Cranioplasty in Relation to Material: Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Jack Henry, Michael Amoo, Joseph Taylor, David P O’Brien

Neurosurgery.2021; 89(3): 383. CrossRef

Meta-Analysis of Use of Different Types of Implants in Cranioplastic Interventions in Neurosurgery

Д.П. Веевник, А.И. Трутько, А.А. Ходиченко

Неврология и нейрохирургия. Восточная Европа.2021; (2): 188. CrossRef

Comparison of two different titanium cranioplasty methods: Custom-made titanium prostheses versus precurved titanium mesh

Domenico Policicchio, Gina Casu, Giosuè Dipellegrini, Artan Doda, Giampiero Muggianu, Riccardo Boccaletti

Surgical Neurology International.2020; 11: 148. CrossRef

Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Surface Fabrication for Innovative Cranial and Maxillofacial Surgery

Simona Cavalu, Iulian Vasile Antoniac, Aurel Mohan, Florian Bodog, Cristian Doicin, Ileana Mates, Mihaela Ulmeanu, Roman Murzac, Augustin Semenescu

Materials.2020; 13(23): 5391. CrossRef

Evaluation and Prediction of Mass Transport Properties for Porous Implant with Different Unit Cells: A Numerical Study

BioMed Research International.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef