| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 1998;27(7): 865-871.
The Comparison of the Cerebroprotective Effects between Postischemic Systemic Hypothermia and Selective Brain Cooling in Focal Cerebral Infarction.
Hoon Jang, Chun Kun Park, Joon Ki Kang
Department of Neurosurgery, Catholic University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.
ABSTRACT
The cerebroprotective effects of mild to moderate hypothermia(about 32degreesC) in brain ischemia have been well established. Taking into consideration of potential deleterious systemic effects of total body cooling, selective brain cooling(SBC) can be considered as an alternative mean, and recently the protective effects of SBC in focal cerebral ischemia have been reported. However, there has been no attempt to draw a comparison of antiischemic and systemic effects between systemic hypothermia(SH) and SBC. The present study investigates the effects of SH and SBC on the physiological variables, neurological outcome, and the volume of brain infarction and edema, and compares each other. In thirty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 300-400g, permanent middle cerebral artery(MCA) occlusions were performed. Five groups of animals were studied; group 1, normothermic control(n=6); group 2, systemic hypothermia for 30min(n=6); group 3, selective brain cooling for 30min(n=6); group 4, systemic hypothermia for 60min(n=6); and group 5, selective brain cooling for 60min(n=6). In the hypothermia groups, active cooling was performed 15min following MCA occlusion. During the experimental procedures, the physiological variables such as mean arterial blood pressure and blood gases were continuously monitored. Twenty-four hours following MCA occlusion, the rats were sacrificed. Eight predefined coronal sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and the volume of ischemic damage and edema was computed. The results are as follows: 1) There were no differences in the physiological variables between SH and SBC groups. 2) In the hypothermia groups, neurological outcome was much better(p<0.05) than that in the control. 3) The volume of ischemic damage was significantly reduced to 49.2%(p<0.05) in group 4 and 26.7%(p<0.05) in group 5, compared to group 1. 4) Ischemic brain edema was significantly attenuated in group 4(23.6%; p<0.05) and group 5(7.8%; p<0.05), compared to group 1. These results reveal that systemic hypothermia may exert more beneficial effects upon focal cerebral infarction without significant systemic complication than selective brain cooling.
Key Words: Focal brain infarction; Selective brain cooling; Hypothermia; Neuroprotection; Rat
Editorial Office
1F, 18, Heolleung-ro 569-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
TEL: +82-2-525-7552   FAX: +82-2-525-7554   E-mail: office@jkns.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Neurosurgical Society.                 Developed in M2PI
Close layer