CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Full-Endoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Seong Son, Byung Rhae Yoo, Sang Gu Lee, Woo Kyung Kim, Jong Myung Jung
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2022;65(4):539-548.   Published online 2022 June 29    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2021.0168

Excel Download

Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
World Neurosurgery. 2021;152:e352-e368   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

The effect of two surgical approach Lordosis correction in degenerative lumbar diseases: minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus transforminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
. 2020;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Neurosurgical Review. 2016;41(3):755-770   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Clinical outcomes, complications and fusion rates in endoscopic assisted intraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (iLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): systematic review and meta-analysis
Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Full-Endoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2022;65(4):539-548   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
European Spine Journal. 2015;24(5):1017-1030   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) in Interbody Fusion Technique for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Life. 2021;11(7):696   Crossref logo
Link1

Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with a Tubular Retractor System: A Retrospective Controlled Study
World Neurosurgery. 2022;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Revision Surgery for the Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation After Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
. 2020;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
World Neurosurgery. 2020;133:358-365.e4   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

This metadata service is kindly provided by CrossRef from May 29, 2014. J Korean Neurosurg Soc has participated in CrossRef Text and Data Mining service since March 1, 2015.